Newsletter

Foreign media: China, Japan, Malaysia and Thailand defend the 21-point badminton system, Indonesia and South Korea’s anti-cooperation attempted

Original title: Foreign media: China, Japan, Malaysia and Thailand defend the 21-point badminton system, Indonesia and South Korea’s anti-cooperation attempted

Recently, Indonesian media “BadmintonTalk” disclosed the details of the 11-point voting system for the World Badminton Federation a few days ago. The World Badminton Federation held a public vote in 2018, when there were 129 votes in favor and 123 votes against. In the latest vote on May 22, the result was a very thrilling 187 votes in favor and 95 votes against. The difference between the votes for approval reached the statutory two-thirds of 188 votes. The Indonesian media revealed that South Korea, Indonesia, Chinese Taipei and other associations voted for another anti-Geism this time. However, major badminton countries such as China, Japan, Malaysia, and Thailand voted against it, defending the current 21-point system in a thrilling manner.

The World Badminton Federation initiated an 11-point voting during the Bangkok Tangyu Cup in May 2018. The result was 129 votes in favor and 123 votes against. Since the yes votes did not account for 2/3 of the total votes, the 11-point system failed. Passed. On May 22 this year, the 82nd World Badminton Federation Annual Member Congress was held online. The 11-point voting process that received the most attention was 66.31% (187 votes) in favor and 33.69% (95 votes) against 33.69% (95 votes). There was only one vote between the yes votes and 2/3 of the total of 282, or 188, and the yes votes were 66.31. % Did not reach the 66.67% standard, and the 11-point system promoted by the World Badminton Federation failed to pass.

The World Badminton Federation, under which Larson is the chairman, has expressed a very strong desire to reform the badminton competition system in recent years. The 11-point system is good for offensive players, but not good for players who control the ball. Guoyu’s main players, Chen Yufei and Li Junhui, once publicly opposed the 11-point system, and the 11-point system is not conducive to the technical players Dai Ziying of Taiwan and the Thai women’s singles Intanon. To say that the advantage of the 11-point system is that it is beneficial to offensive and power players. For example, Spain’s Marin is a typical offensive and power play. Moreover, the occasional increase of the 11-point system is conducive to the upset of European players who are not very high but have a certain impact.

This time, the BWF once again voted on the 11-point system after two years. It was fully prepared beforehand. According to the previous announcement of the World Badminton Federation, this time the two associations of Indonesia and Maldives proposed that the Asian Badminton Federation, the Korean Badminton Federation and the Chinese Taipei Badminton Federation publicly expressed their support. Therefore, the World Badminton Federation decided to vote again on the 11-point system.

According to the weight of BWF voting, different associations are divided into 5 levels. In the five most important weights, 10 associations including China, Japan, Malaysia, Thailand, Australia, Canada, England, Hong Kong, Scotland, and the United States voted firmly against it. In the weighting level 4, the three associations of Ireland, Macau and Singapore also voted against it. If even one of these associations vacillated and voted for it at that time, the result would be completely changed to another.

In addition, the Malaysian star Li Zongwei recently ridiculed again in the live broadcast, if the BWF really implements the 11-point system, he will come back and return to the field. The Chinese badminton team has recently returned to Chengdu Shuangliu. Two months before the Tokyo Olympics, the whole team will be in a closed training camp in Shuangliu. For Guo Yu, who has not participated in international competitions for more than a year, Zhang Jun, chairman of the Chinese Badminton Association, said: “Long-term non-playing is a loss for us, but I believe our players can overcome this difficulty. During this time, the players have been training very hard. , The training is also very solid.” Guoyu Men’s Singles Head Coach Xia Xuanze also said: “We directly participate in the Olympic Games, the players are somewhat nervous, but players from other countries have not played too many games, we have to look for difficulties. Confidence, find confidence in training.” (Red)Return to Sohu to see more

Editor:

Disclaimer: The opinions of this article only represent the author himself. Sohu is an information publishing platform. Sohu only provides information storage space services.

.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending